Personally I believe that every once in a while we as humans are placed between a rock and a hard place (a difficult situation in which a decision has to be made), thus being as imperfect as we are, we are compelled into action to do what we have to do to survive. Life can become difficult at times and to be ready one needs to nake sure that the'house" is in order. To be honest with you all you can never be completely ready for life's hardship no matter how prepared you may think you maybe. So Iwould recommend us all as humans to just cry and let life run its course.
Ideas and beliefs about things that are required to achieve good conduct may be referred to as ethics. Ethics is highly relative and is therefore very difficult to bring clarity what one ought to do. What one ought to do is a very controversial issue, as a great deal of information must be acquired and considered upon for example fairness, authority, deontological ethics, care and justice, divine command and the causes, effects and consequences of what the act one consider one ought to do. What one ought to do is normally expressed in culturally relative ways across different society and when approached individually within a particular society where one is considered a stranger what one ought to do becomes a struggle. What one ought to do is an enforcement upon humans to act a certain way or the way society prefers one to act based on the rules and law imposed upon us, breach of such law is punishable. One cannot concretely determine what another ought to do as a normal behavior over time becomes a deviant act due to the fact that society is constantly changing its rules, to benefit the majority but what happens when the minority is deeply affected with what they ought to do as deemed by society?. In the case of necessity- that which is indispensably requisite to an end desired that one cannot do without, it is not fair to abide by the notion of what one ought to do as lives may depend on that single action which one ought not to do.
Ideas and beliefs about things that are required to achieve good conduct may be referred to as ethics. Ethics is highly relative and is therefore very difficult to bring clarity what one ought to do. What one ought to do is a very controversial issue, as a great deal of information must be acquired and considered upon for example fairness, authority, deontological ethics, care and justice, divine command and the causes, effects and consequences of what the act one consider one ought to do. What one ought to do is normally expressed in culturally relative ways across different society and when approached individually within a particular society where one is considered a stranger what one ought to do becomes a struggle. What one ought to do is an enforcement upon humans to act a certain way or the way society prefers one to act based on the rules and law imposed upon us, breach of such law is punishable. One cannot concretely determine what another ought to do as a normal behavior over time becomes a deviant act due to the fact that society is constantly changing its rules, to benefit the majority but what happens when the minority is deeply affected with what they ought to do as deemed by society?. In the case of necessity- that which is indispensably requisite to an end desired that one cannot do without, it is not fair to abide by the notion of what one ought to do as lives may depend on that single action which one ought not to do.

No comments:
Post a Comment